Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42614435›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Perceived rivalry in intergroup conflict.

David A Reinhard, Peter T Gianiodis, Gilad Hirschberger, Bernhard Leidner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David A ReinhardGraduate School of Business, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Peter T GianiodisPalumbo-Donahue School of Business, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Gilad HirschbergerBaruch Ivcher School of Psychology, Reichman University, Herzliya, Israel.
Bernhard LeidnerPsychology of Peace and Violence Program, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We draw on an emerging psychological view of rivalry as a relational perception and apply it to intergroup conflict. We examine whether perceived intergroup rivalry predicts support for conflict escalation above and beyond enemy-related perceptions and threat, and whether rivalry is more closely linked to conflict-related identity relevance, defined as the extent to which conflict with an adversary is seen as part of collective identity. Using a quota-based sample of Jewish Israelis approximating national representativeness, we assessed perceptions of Iran as a rival and as an enemy, support for conflict escalation, conflict-related identity relevance, and multidimensional threat. Perceived rivalry uniquely predicted support for conflict escalation. Perceived rivalry was also more closely associated with conflict-related identity relevance than enemy-related perceptions were, suggesting that rivals may be viewed as more deeply embedded in collective identity. These findings suggest that perceived intergroup rivalry captures a psychologically embedded form of adversarial perception that may help explain why some intergroup conflicts are especially difficult to defuse.

Indexed as

collective identityenmityintergroup conflictinternational relationsrivalry

Identifiers

PMID42614435
PMCPMC13481545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.