ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Perceived rivalry in intergroup conflict.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We draw on an emerging psychological view of rivalry as a relational perception and apply it to intergroup conflict. We examine whether perceived intergroup rivalry predicts support for conflict escalation above and beyond enemy-related perceptions and threat, and whether rivalry is more closely linked to conflict-related identity relevance, defined as the extent to which conflict with an adversary is seen as part of collective identity. Using a quota-based sample of Jewish Israelis approximating national representativeness, we assessed perceptions of Iran as a rival and as an enemy, support for conflict escalation, conflict-related identity relevance, and multidimensional threat. Perceived rivalry uniquely predicted support for conflict escalation. Perceived rivalry was also more closely associated with conflict-related identity relevance than enemy-related perceptions were, suggesting that rivals may be viewed as more deeply embedded in collective identity. These findings suggest that perceived intergroup rivalry captures a psychologically embedded form of adversarial perception that may help explain why some intergroup conflicts are especially difficult to defuse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.