Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42614429›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in neuroscience2026

Efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation for disorders of consciousness: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis based on sham-controlled randomized trials.

Fuqiang Wang, Yaojiang Li, Lixia Deng, Congping Huang, Liangxiang Zhang, Chunmei Zhao, Haoqiang He, Xiao Lu, Yunhong Deng

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Fuqiang WangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Guangdong Sanjiu Brain Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yaojiang LiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Guangdong Sanjiu Brain Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Lixia DengDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Guangdong Sanjiu Brain Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Congping HuangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Guangdong Sanjiu Brain Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Liangxiang ZhangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Guangdong Sanjiu Brain Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Chunmei ZhaoDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Guangdong Sanjiu Brain Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Haoqiang HeDepartment of Rehabilitation Therapy, Guangdong Sanjiu Brain Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Xiao LuDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Guangdong Sanjiu Brain Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yunhong DengDepartment of Rehabilitation Therapy, Guangdong Sanjiu Brain Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) may improve behavioral signs of consciousness in patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC), but evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and previous meta-analyses has remained inconsistent. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of tDCS in patients with DoC and explored potential effect modifiers. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for RCTs comparing active tDCS with sham stimulation. For crossover trials, only first-period data were extracted. The primary outcome was the change in Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) score. Mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled across studies. Subgroup analyses were performed according to baseline level of consciousness, etiology, disease duration, stimulation target, and total stimulation dose. Results: Fourteen trials including 330 patients were included. Active tDCS was associated with greater improvement in CRS-R change scores than sham stimulation (MD = 1.02, 95% CI 0.43-1.60; Conclusion: tDCS may improve the level of consciousness in patients with DoC, with no definite tDCS-related serious adverse events identified. Treatment response may differ by etiology, but this finding requires confirmation because multiple subgroup comparisons were performed. Systematic review registration: Identifier CRD420261370518.

Indexed as

Coma Recovery Scale–Reviseddisorders of consciousnessmeta-analysisneuromodulationtranscranial direct current stimulation

Identifiers

PMID42614429
PMCPMC13481543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.