Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42614409›Full record

ArticleDiscover water2026

Risk-based prioritization of operation and maintenance indicators for school sanitation decision support in Kampala City, Uganda.

Jude Zziwa Byansi, Swaib Semiyaga, Alex Yasoni Katukiza, Najib Lukooya Bateganya, Angella Mercy Nakaye, Frank Kansiime, Robinah Nakawunde Kulabako

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Discover water, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jude Zziwa ByansiDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, Design, Art and Technology, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda.
Swaib SemiyagaDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, Design, Art and Technology, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda.
Alex Yasoni KatukizaDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, Design, Art and Technology, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda.
Najib Lukooya BateganyaDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, Design, Art and Technology, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda.
Angella Mercy NakayeBenign Gynecology Department, Mulago Specialized Women and Neonatal Hospital, P.O. Box 2208, Kampala, Uganda.
Frank KansiimeDepartment of Environmental Management, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda.
Robinah Nakawunde KulabakoDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, Design, Art and Technology, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective operation and maintenance (O&M) of sanitation facilities are vital for ensuring consistent service delivery in schools, yet many low- and middle-income contexts continue to face challenges stemming from reactive maintenance practices and weak management systems. This study developed and applied a risk-based approach to identify and prioritize O&M processes that most threaten the continuity of sanitation services in Kampala City schools. Using a cross-sectional workshop-based design, 106 head teachers and 99 sanitation teachers from 205 schools assessed the status, likelihood, and severity of failure for 33 indicators across six O&M domains. Risk scores were computed following the adapted World Health Organization's Sanitation Safety Planning framework, and indicators were ranked using median (P50) and upper-quartile (P75) statistics to identify priority areas. The results showed that 46% of the indicators were rated as low risk, 24% as medium risk, and 30% as high risk, with no indicator classified as very high-risk. Material supply and use management, toilet cleanliness, preventive maintenance schedules, menstrual hygiene material provision, and sanitation budget-line implementation were identified as the most critical areas requiring attention. Although several monitoring and evaluation indicators ranked as lower risk, this reflects their strong current performance rather than a reduced importance in sustaining sanitation services. The findings highlight that the main threats to sanitation service reliability arise from weak O&M practices and resource management processes rather than infrastructure deficits. Targeting preventive maintenance, supply management, and budget execution provides a practical pathway for strengthening the functionality, reliability, and continuity of sanitation services within resource-limited school environments. Graphical abstract: Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43832-026-00412-4.

Indexed as

Operation and maintenanceRisk-based prioritizationSchool sanitation

Identifiers

PMID42614409
PMCPMC13481572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.