Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42614397›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026

Clinical application of deep learning-based measurement of glomerular morphometry in IgAN.

Lin-Lin Xu, Xing-Kuo Zhang, Zhen-Zheng Dong, Pei Chen, Lei Jiang, Li-Jun Liu, Xu-Jie Zhou, Ji-Cheng Lv, Li Xiao, Su-Fang Shi and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lin-Lin Xu *Renal Division, Peking University First Hospital; Kidney Genetics Center, Peking University Institute of Nephrology; Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China; Key Laboratory of Chronic Kidney Disease Prevention and Treatment, Peking University, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China.
Xing-Kuo Zhang *School of Artificial Intelligence, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China.
Zhen-Zheng DongSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China.
Pei ChenRenal Division, Peking University First Hospital; Kidney Genetics Center, Peking University Institute of Nephrology; Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China; Key Laboratory of Chronic Kidney Disease Prevention and Treatment, Peking University, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China.
Lei JiangRenal Division, Peking University First Hospital; Kidney Genetics Center, Peking University Institute of Nephrology; Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China; Key Laboratory of Chronic Kidney Disease Prevention and Treatment, Peking University, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China.
Li-Jun LiuRenal Division, Peking University First Hospital; Kidney Genetics Center, Peking University Institute of Nephrology; Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China; Key Laboratory of Chronic Kidney Disease Prevention and Treatment, Peking University, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China.
Xu-Jie ZhouRenal Division, Peking University First Hospital; Kidney Genetics Center, Peking University Institute of Nephrology; Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China; Key Laboratory of Chronic Kidney Disease Prevention and Treatment, Peking University, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China.
Ji-Cheng LvRenal Division, Peking University First Hospital; Kidney Genetics Center, Peking University Institute of Nephrology; Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China; Key Laboratory of Chronic Kidney Disease Prevention and Treatment, Peking University, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China.
Li XiaoSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China.
Su-Fang ShiRenal Division, Peking University First Hospital; Kidney Genetics Center, Peking University Institute of Nephrology; Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China; Key Laboratory of Chronic Kidney Disease Prevention and Treatment, Peking University, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China.
Hong ZhangRenal Division, Peking University First Hospital; Kidney Genetics Center, Peking University Institute of Nephrology; Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China; Key Laboratory of Chronic Kidney Disease Prevention and Treatment, Peking University, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Accurate glomerular pathology assessment is crucial for predicting outcomes and guiding treatment in IgA nephropathy (IgAN). Although the Oxford classification provides a standardized histological assessment, it is semi-quantitative and subjective. Identifying objective and interpretable renal pathological features could enhance prognostic prediction. Methods: We developed and validated a deep learning-based computational pathology pipeline for glomerular analysis in IgAN. A glomerular segmentation and classification model was developed based on deep convolutional neural networks in 183 periodic acid-Schiff (PAS)-stained whole slide images (WSIs) of renal pathology from IgAN patients, and was further applied to WSIs of 886 IgAN patients from a prospective cohort. Associations of glomerular morphometry with clinical phenotypes and prognosis were determined. Results: The models demonstrated glomerular segmentation performance with a Dice coefficient of 0.91 and classification performance with an AUC of 0.94. Through a comprehensive correlation analysis of quantitative morphometric characteristics and clinical parameters, we found that age, gender, and body mass index significantly influenced glomerular morphology. No association was found between proteinuria and glomerular size. Notably, a nonlinear relationship was observed between glomerular size and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), with patients having an eGFR between 30 and 60 ml/min/1.73m Conclusions: In conclusion, we developed an end-to-end pipeline for glomerular segmentation, classification, and morphometry in WSIs. These objective and highly reproducible quantitative characteristics of glomeruli may serve as a valuable tool for therapeutic guidance and prognostic assessment in IgAN.

Indexed as

Deep LearningGlomerulonephritis, IGAKidney GlomerulusAdultFemaleGlomerular Filtration RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProspective Studiescomputational pathologydeep learningglomerular sizeIgA nephropathyrenal pathology

Identifiers

PMID42614397
PMCPMC13481774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.