Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42614380›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Differential contributions of working memory and inhibitory control to prospective memory detection and retrieval.

Sumyah A Alnajashi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sumyah A AlnajashiDepartment of Psychology, College of Education, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Prospective memory (PM)-remembering to carry out intended actions at the right moment - depends on executive control, but the specific contributions of working memory and inhibitory control to PM cue detection versus intention retrieval remain debated. Methods: Eighty-four adults (44 action video game players, 40 non-players) aged 18-45 completed a within-subjects PM paradigm with separate detection and retrieval conditions, along with measures of working memory (digit span forward/backward, Corsi block), inhibitory control (Stroop interference), and nonverbal reasoning (Raven's Colored Progressive Matrices). Multiple regression and a stacked long-format model with cluster-robust standard errors tested predictor-outcome associations and their interaction with PM component. Results: Backward digit span (executive working memory) was a significant positive predictor of PM detection ( Conclusion: Working memory was selectively associated with the detection phase of PM, providing partial support for multiprocess accounts in which different executive mechanisms are differentially recruited across PM phases. The role of inhibitory control was less phase-specific. Modest action video game experience does not confer measurable PM advantages.

Indexed as

action video gamescue detectionexecutive functioninhibitory controlintention retrievalprospective memoryworking memory

Identifiers

PMID42614380
PMCPMC13481724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.