ArticleEJHaem2026
Patient Journey, Treatment Patterns, and Disease Burden of Patients With Idiopathic Hypereosinophilic Syndrome.
Article in EJHaem, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome (I-HES) is a rare disorder characterized by persistent eosinophilia without an identifiable underlying cause, leading to organ damage and dysfunction. The objectives of this study were to describe the real-world demographics, patient journey, treatment patterns, and disease burden of patients with I-HES. Methods: Data were drawn from the Adelphi Real World HES Disease Specific Programme, a cross-sectional survey of physicians and their patients with I-HES in Europe (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK) and the United States from July to December 2023. Results: The overall population included 117 physicians and 451 patients. Patients were predominately male (62%), White (87%), and the mean (standard deviation [SD]) age was 44.7 (16.1) years. Mean (SD) and median (range) time between symptom onset and I-HES diagnosis was 8.2 (11.1) and 4.2 (0-87.3) months, respectively. Most patients (66%) were treated with corticosteroids, and the mean (SD) and median (range) doses of oral and/or parenteral corticosteroids were 19.1 (20.3) and 10.0 (1.0-100.0) mg/day, respectively. The use of interleukin-5/receptor alpha targeted therapies was low (23%). Patients had a mean (SD) of 7.7 (6.4) symptoms at diagnosis; 58% had organ system damage attributed to I-HES, and disease was perceived by physicians as moderate or severe in 72%. Patient-reported health-related quality of life, work productivity, and fatigue were negatively impacted in patients with deteriorating or moderate-to-severe disease. Conclusion: These findings underscore the need for greater disease awareness to support timely diagnosis with use of targeted, corticosteroid-sparing treatments to improve patient outcomes. Trial Registration: The authors have confirmed clinical trial registration is not needed for this submission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.