ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Why do they sign but not consult? A study on the effectiveness of China's family doctor contract services from the perspective of patient-doctor interaction.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Family doctor contract services (FDCS) in China aim to promote primary care first-contact, yet the "sign but no consult" phenomenon persists Traditional accessibility models fail to explain the heterogeneity in patient behavior. This study introduces Interactive Interpersonal Perceived Quality (IIPQ) as a key construct to understand why and for whom FDCS is effective, from a person-centered perspective. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study using data from the 2024 Tianjin family doctor service resident survey, which included 4,578 residents across 16 districts in Tianjin, China. We measured potential accessibility (geographic, financial), realized accessibility, and IIPQ (comprising perceived feasibility, desirability, and continuity). The primary outcome was Family Doctor First-Contact Behavior (FDFCB). Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) was employed to identify distinct patient subgroups based on their IIPQ scores, followed by logistic regression to examine the moderating effects. Results: Three distinct patient profiles were identified via LPA: a low perceived quality group, a moderate perceived quality group and a high perceived quality group. Realized accessibility positively predicted FDFCB, and its effect was significantly moderated by IIPQ, with perceived continuity playing a key role. Notably, traditional potential accessibility measures (geographic and financial) showed no significant direct effect on FDFCB after accounting for other factors. Conclusion: Patients are not a homogenous group; their subjective perception of the doctor-patient relationship is a critical, and often overlooked, determinant of FDCS effectiveness. The impact of service accessibility depends on patients' interpersonal experience. The true value of FDCS lies in its capacity to shift patients' decision-making logic from a reliance on structural convenience to a reliance on relational trusts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.