ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026
Intraoperative indeterminate frozen-section margin leading to an unintended R1 resection in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a case report and decision-making framework.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intraoperative frozen-section (FS) margin assessment is essential for guiding precise resection in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA). However, freezing artifacts, superficial sampling, drainage-related reactive epithelial changes, and subtle cytologic atypia in well-differentiated adenocarcinoma can make intraoperative interpretation difficult. We report a 70-year-old woman with Bismuth-Corlette type II pCCA who underwent radical extrahepatic bile duct resection after PTBD-mediated biliary decompression. Intraoperative FS of the distal bile duct margin showed atypical glands of undetermined nature, while proximal margins were negative. Because additional caudal resection would probably have required combined pancreaticoduodenectomy in an elderly patient recovering from severe obstructive jaundice, the surgical team avoided extended resection after real-time surgical-pathological discussion. Permanent sections and immunohistochemistry subsequently confirmed well-differentiated adenocarcinoma involving the distal margin, perineural invasion, and regional lymph-node metastasis, consistent with an unintended R1 resection. This case illustrates that an indeterminate FS margin should be regarded as a high-risk gray-zone finding rather than a safe negative result. We propose a three-tier margin risk-stratification framework in which a "presumed positive" principle triggers repeat oriented sampling, intraoperative multidisciplinary consultation, and individualized balancing of oncologic radicality against physiological reserve. When aggressive resection is contraindicated, meticulous documentation, early adjuvant therapy, and rigorous long-term surveillance are essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.