ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Academic transition shock: How first-year public health students navigate unfamiliar learning demands in computer science education.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Public health students often enter training with learning strategies optimized for memorization and recall that prove inadequate when confronted with unfamiliar cognitive demands. This study explored how first-year public health students experience and navigate academic transition when encountering an introductory computer science course that challenges their established learning approaches. Methods: A qualitative interview study was conducted with 10 first-year public health students enrolled in a mandatory computer science course. Semi-structured interviews explored students' expectations, experiences of difficulty, emotional responses, and adaptive strategies. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results: Four interconnected themes emerged: expectation shock and the collapse of familiar patterns, encountering unfamiliar dimensions of difficulty, developing adaptive responses through trial and necessity, and reframing academic competence from recall to reasoning. Students initially relied on memorization-based strategies that had proven successful in prior education, but programming tasks exposed the inadequacy of these approaches. Through iterative engagement with unfamiliar demands, students gradually developed reasoning-oriented strategies, increased tolerance for ambiguity, and reconceptualized learning as an iterative process rather than accurate reproduction of information. Conclusions: Academic transitions that challenge students' implicit learning assumptions can serve important developmental functions by exposing limitations in established approaches and creating conditions where cognitive adaptation becomes necessary. Public health curricula may benefit from intentionally incorporating early learning experiences that resist memorization-based strategies, helping students develop adaptive learning capabilities before encountering high-stakes fieldwork and practice contexts where flexible problem-solving is essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.