Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42614212›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2026

Interdisciplinary insights on selection, surveillance and mitigations of antimicrobial resistance dynamics on a UK dairy farm with relevance to other one health sectors.

Dov J Stekel, Ryan Cook, Delveen R Ibrahim, Michael A Jones, Diane T Levine, Chris D Hudson, Jan-Ulrich Kreft, Jon L Hobman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dov J StekelSchool of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Leicestershire, United Kingdom.
Ryan CookQuadram Institute Bioscience, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Delveen R IbrahimDepartment of Biology, College of Science, The University of Duhok, Duhok, Iraq.
Michael A JonesSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Leicestershire, United Kingdom.
Diane T LevineSchool of Criminology, Sociology and Social Policy, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Chris D HudsonSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Leicestershire, United Kingdom.
Jan-Ulrich KreftSchool of Biosciences and Institute of Microbiology and Infection, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Jon L HobmanSchool of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Leicestershire, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibiotic use in agriculture is a global driver for antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Dairy farming, one of the largest producers of agricultural waste, represents a critical opportunity for mitigating AMR impacts. We review, synthesize and generalize from results of 10 years of interdisciplinary study of AMR in the waste from a single, medium-sized intensive UK dairy farm and related One Health AMR work. Resistance patterns reflect a combination of (i) short-term stability with (ii) long-term change associated with altered antibiotic use. These dynamics were driven by clonal expansion and contraction characterized by chromosomal carriage of resistance, and co-selection by environmentally stable antimicrobials including copper, zinc and tetracycline, rather than horizontal gene transfer. We outline 10 considerations for study, surveillance and mitigation: (i) the need for long-term longitudinal sampling; (ii) the value of intense focus on representative sites; (iii) inclusion of both Gram-positive and Gram-negative sentinels; (iv) adoption of shared standards for measurement and reporting; (v) use of precise language for AMR hazards to enable appropriate study site selection; (vi) reduction of overall antibiotic use, e.g., through infection control; (vii) continued avoidance of veterinary use of internationally recognized critical human antibiotics; (viii) avoidance of environmentally stable antibiotics such as some tetracyclines; (ix) reduction of co-selection pressure via recovery of metals such as copper and zinc; and (x) mitigation of resistance through storage of slurry without further additions, e.g., through the use of two-tank systems. We propose that these considerations are relevant beyond dairy, applicable in wider livestock, environmental and One Health settings.

Indexed as

AMR mitigation strategiesAMR surveillanceantimicrobial resistancedairy (cows)one health

Identifiers

PMID42614212
PMCPMC13481307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.