Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42614180›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

The relationship between college students' English learning enjoyment, anxiety, and engagement: the mediating role of grit and the moderating role of flow.

Xiaofei Zhen, Xiaolian Lian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xiaofei ZhenSchool of Translation and Interpreting Studies, Heilongjiang University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Xiaolian LianSchool of Foreign Languages and Literature, Heilongjiang University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Learning engagement is a key indicator of college English learning quality. In the Chinese EFL context, engagement is closely related to learning emotions, psychological resources, and situational learning states. This study examined learning enjoyment, learning anxiety, grit, flow, and learning engagement within a Control-Value Theory framework. Method: A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 875 Chinese college students. Standardized questionnaires assessed learning enjoyment, learning anxiety, grit, flow, and learning engagement. Data were analyzed using SPSS 26.0 and AMOS 24.0. Results: Learning enjoyment was positively associated with learning engagement, whereas learning anxiety was negatively associated with it. Grit was a significant mediator in both associations. Flow moderated the associations between enjoyment and grit, enjoyment and engagement, anxiety and grit, and anxiety and engagement, but not the grit-engagement pathway. At higher levels of flow, the positive associations involving enjoyment were stronger, whereas the negative associations involving anxiety were weaker. Conclusion: This study extends Control-Value Theory by integrating emotional experiences, trait-like psychological resources, and situational cognitive-affective states. The non-significant flow × grit interaction help clarify the boundary conditions of flow, suggesting that flow may be more relevant to emotion-sensitive pathways than to the stable grit-engagement pathway. The findings suggest that college English teaching should attend to positive emotional experiences, anxiety-related difficulties, grit, and flow-supportive learning conditions.

Indexed as

flowgritlearning anxietylearning engagementlearning enjoyment

Identifiers

PMID42614180
PMCPMC13481215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.