ArticleFrontiers in physiology2026
Heart rate variability and burnout risk among healthy employees in jobs involving interaction with others.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interaction-intensive work is characterised by high social demands, stressful situations, and emotional regulation. It can therefore be a risk factor for high level of work-related stress and burnout. Chronic stress has been linked to changes in autonomic regulation, as reflected by heart rate variability (HRV), an objective indicator of stress. The aim of the study was to investigate the association between burnout risk and HRV in healthy employees engaged in high-interaction work. A cross-sectional analysis was conducted on 202 working adults (including nursery teachers, bank clerks and medical assistants) with an average age of 41.1 ± 11.4 years (median 40.4 years, range 22-63 years). Burnout risk was assessed using the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI-GS). Participants were divided into three groups according to their burnout risk level. HRV was analysed comparatively across these three groups using 24-hour recordings as well as a 6-hour analysis during the day and at night. An increased risk of burnout was observed in 5.4% of the participants in the total sample. Significant differences in HRV between the three groups with and without varying levels of burnout risk were primarily observed in the 24-hour interval (including heart rate: p = 0.039; LF n.s., HF n.s. and LF/HF: p = 0.009 in each case) as well as in the 6-hour daytime interval for the MeanRR (p = 0.002), but not at night. Correlation analyses revealed predominantly weak associations between HRV and burnout dimensions. The strongest associations were observed in the daytime interval (e.g. MBI total score with LF ρ = -0.271; p < 0.01 and with pNN50 ρ = 0.271; p < 0.01). Age in particular proved was found to be a significant influencing factor in the analysis of variance, with large effect sizes on several HRV parameters (e.g. pNN50 η² = 0.178; RMSSD η² = 0.173). Even the first results suggest that work-related stress and burnout factors in healthy employees engaged in interactive work may be reflected in subtle changes in autonomic regulation, further analysis have shown that the effects are mainly driven by age and gender, two factors that have an impact on HRV. This shows that it is important to analysis not only autonomic regulation along e.g. by measuring HRV, but also to consider influencing co-factors that have an impact on them. On total, in the examined group it was not able to show a different between persons with high and low interactive work in subtle changes in autonomic regulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.