ArticleScandinavian journal of caring sciences2026
Parents' Views on Family Care at a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit - A Qualitative Study.
Article in Scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe current study aims to explore parents' views on family care at a neonatal intensive care unit.
methodsWe conducted a qualitative exploratory study with a descriptive approach based on open-ended written narrative responses from the Danish version of EMpowerment of PArents in The Intensive Care-Neonatology questionnaire. The study was conducted at a Danish level IV NICU working with family-centred care and family integrated care. The data was analysed using inductive content analysis by Graneheim and Lundman. The Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist was followed. MAIN
findingsIn total, 311/727 parents responded to the distributed questionnaire. Of those, 210 responded to the open-ended questions. While general expressions of satisfaction and praise were noted, the qualitative analysis focused on responses that included more elaborated comments. We generated two themes, Challenges in communication and recognition in NICU care and Balancing family needs and support systems in NICU. Communication with nurses and physicians included both positive experiences and areas for improvement, with some parents experiencing confusion and insecurity. Emotional support, privacy and the opportunity for bonding were often overlooked, leaving parents feeling excluded from the care process. Parents reported a lack of individualized care that considered their unique needs as a family.
conclusionThe findings underscore the need for improved communication, better parental involvement in care decisions, and more attention to emotional and relational support. Addressing these areas could enhance the overall neonatal experience and the needs of infants and their families, ultimately improving care quality and satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.