ArticleScandinavian journal of caring sciences2026
Care Practices Supporting Older Adult Mobility in Institutional Long-Term Care: An Ethnographic Study.
Article in Scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOlder adults living in institutional long-term care (ILTC) generally have decreased mobility, and their mobility care is often insufficient. Residents spend much of their day being sedentary, even though sedentary behaviour and inactivity are known to have many negative effects on health and functional capacity. More qualitative research describing care practices that support residents' everyday mobility in ILTC is needed. The aim of this study is to describe how care workers support residents' mobility in one ILTC unit.
methodsA focused ethnographic study was conducted. Data were collected by observing care workers (n = 10) and residents (n = 12) in one ILTC unit in May and June 2023. Data collection was guided by Spradley's framework. In addition, informal interviews were conducted with the care workers during the observations. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis.
resultsCare workers carried out mobility care through situational compromises between person-centred mobility care and institutional expectations. While mobility care was person-centred, supporting residents' autonomy and grounded in residents' mobility needs, it was also shaped by institutional expectations. Institutional expectations were evident when other essential care activities were prioritized and routine practices were utilized in mobility care.
conclusionsMobility care occurs in the interaction process between care workers and residents. Supporting residents' mobility requires care workers to balance person-centred mobility care and institutional expectations. Therefore, care workers need guidance for communication with residents with dementia, sufficient resources, and shared practices to enable quality mobility care in ILTC. Mobility care should also be embedded in institutional values and guidelines to prevent it from becoming a mechanical activity of the residents' day.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.