Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42613999›Full record

ReviewActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2026

Chromosomal and genetic anomalies in fetuses with nuchal translucency between 3.0 and 3.4 mm: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Arianna Carta, Lorenza Della Valle, Giuseppe Rizzo, Ilenia Mappa, Giuseppe Maruotti, Maria Elena Flacco, Lamberto Manzoli, Gennaro Cormio, Asma Khalil, Alberto Galindo and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Arianna CartaUnit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari 'Aldo Moro', Policlinico of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Lorenza Della ValleCenter for Fetal Care and High-Risk Pregnancy, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9809-922X
Giuseppe RizzoDepartment of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5525-4353
Ilenia MappaDepartment of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9866-3050
Giuseppe MaruottiGynecology and Obstetrics Unit, Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Maria Elena FlaccoDepartment of Environmental and Preventive Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1404-4314
Lamberto ManzoliDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8129-9344
Gennaro CormioObstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, Bari, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5745-372X
Asma KhalilFetal Medicine Unit, St. George's University of London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2802-7670
Alberto GalindoFetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1308-1474
Francesco D'AntonioCenter for Fetal Care and High-Risk Pregnancy, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo report the prevalence of chromosomal anomalies in fetuses with a nuchal translucency (NT) between 3.0 and 3.4 mm and to assess the incremental yield of invasive prenatal diagnosis over cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in these fetuses. MATERIAL AND

methodsMEDLINE, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library were searched. Inclusion criteria encompassed fetuses with an NT between 3.0 and 3.4 mm undergoing prenatal invasive testing or postnatal genetic assessment. The observed outcomes included common trisomies such as Trisomy 21, 18, and 13, sex chromosomal anomalies (SCAs), rare autosomal anomalies, copy number variants detected by chromosomal microarray (CMA), and single-gene disorders. We also reported the rate of anomalies potentially detectable by cfDNA. Finally, we planned to perform a subgroup analysis involving cases with isolated NT between 3.0 and 3.4 mm, including only cases undergoing detailed first-trimester ultrasound assessment. A random-effects meta-analysis of proportions was utilized to analyze the data.

resultsSeventeen studies (7007 fetuses) were included. In fetuses with NT measurements between 3.0 and 3.4 mm, chromosomal anomalies were identified in 13.1% (95% CI 9.3-17.3). Common trisomies included Trisomy 21 at 8.0% (95% CI 5.1-11.5), Trisomy 18 at 1.0% (95% CI 0.6-1.7), and Trisomy 13 at 0.52% (95% CI 0.2-1.0) of all chromosomal anomalies. SCAs occurred in 0.58% (95% CI 0.4-0.8), while rare autosomal trisomies and pathogenic or likely pathogenic copy number variants (CNVs) were found in 0.27% (95% CI 0.1-0.6) and 2.5% (95% CI 1.3-3.9), respectively. Additionally, single-gene disorders detected via NGS/WES were reported in 5.7% (95% CI 3.3-8) of cases with NT between 3.0 and 3.4 mm. When examining only fetuses with an isolated NT between 3.0 and 3.4 mm, all chromosomal anomalies were identified in 12.4% (95% CI 7.9-17.7).

conclusionsFetuses with an NT between 3.0 and 3.4 mm showed a high rate of chromosomal anomalies and CNVs, most of which could potentially be detected through cfDNA.

Indexed as

cfDNAchromosomal anomaliesCNVsnuchal translucency between 3.0 and 3.4 mmoutcomeprenatal invasive testing

Identifiers

PMID42613999
PMCPMC13487402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.