Trial reportPsychophysiology2026
Beware of What You Expect? A Partial Replication Study on the Behavioral and Psychophysiological Effects of Negative Expectations on Mechanical Hypersensitivity.
Trial report in Psychophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mechanical hypersensitivity of uninjured skin surrounding a cutaneous injury is a sign of plasticity of the nociceptive system and can be induced in healthy individuals using high-frequency electrical stimulation (HFS). However, despite a broad body of evidence for acute painful stimuli, mixed results have been reported concerning the role of negative expectations in the development of mechanical hypersensitivity. Given the theoretical and clinical relevance of verbal suggestions' impact on the potential development of mechanical hypersensitivity, this study aimed to replicate previous positive findings and establish the effects of negative expectations and HFS on autonomic activity. Sixty participants were randomly assigned to a nocebo or control group, with high-frequency stimulation (HFS) administered to one forearm. Negative expectations were induced only in the nocebo group through written instructions. We assessed the perceived intensity and spatial extent of mechanical hypersensitivity, as well as resting and pinprick-evoked pupil dilation as proxies for tonic arousal and phasic locus coeruleus activity, respectively. No statistically significant group differences were found in mechanical hypersensitivity, its spatial spread, or resting pupil dilation. Pinprick-evoked pupil dilation in the area of mechanical hypersensitivity increased after HFS, but this effect emerged only when a less conservative preprocessing approach was used. Manipulation checks further indicated that some control participants formed negative expectations. Under the present experimental conditions, our results do not support the possibility that negative expectations worsen the development of mechanical sensitivity or increase autonomic responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.