Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42613773›Full record

Trial reportPsychophysiology2026

Beware of What You Expect? A Partial Replication Study on the Behavioral and Psychophysiological Effects of Negative Expectations on Mechanical Hypersensitivity.

Ketan P Jaltare, Martina D'Agostini, Lies De Voeght, Margot Kinnart, Diana M Torta, Emanuel N van den Broeke

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ketan P JaltareHealth Psychology Research Group, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Science, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Martina D'AgostiniHealth Psychology Research Group, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Science, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1383-7638
Lies De VoeghtHealth Psychology Research Group, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Science, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Margot KinnartHealth Psychology Research Group, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Science, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Diana M TortaHealth Psychology Research Group, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Science, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3499-3982
Emanuel N van den BroekeHealth Psychology Research Group, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Science, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek G075320NKU Leuven C16/23/002Queen Elisabeth Medical Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanical hypersensitivity of uninjured skin surrounding a cutaneous injury is a sign of plasticity of the nociceptive system and can be induced in healthy individuals using high-frequency electrical stimulation (HFS). However, despite a broad body of evidence for acute painful stimuli, mixed results have been reported concerning the role of negative expectations in the development of mechanical hypersensitivity. Given the theoretical and clinical relevance of verbal suggestions' impact on the potential development of mechanical hypersensitivity, this study aimed to replicate previous positive findings and establish the effects of negative expectations and HFS on autonomic activity. Sixty participants were randomly assigned to a nocebo or control group, with high-frequency stimulation (HFS) administered to one forearm. Negative expectations were induced only in the nocebo group through written instructions. We assessed the perceived intensity and spatial extent of mechanical hypersensitivity, as well as resting and pinprick-evoked pupil dilation as proxies for tonic arousal and phasic locus coeruleus activity, respectively. No statistically significant group differences were found in mechanical hypersensitivity, its spatial spread, or resting pupil dilation. Pinprick-evoked pupil dilation in the area of mechanical hypersensitivity increased after HFS, but this effect emerged only when a less conservative preprocessing approach was used. Manipulation checks further indicated that some control participants formed negative expectations. Under the present experimental conditions, our results do not support the possibility that negative expectations worsen the development of mechanical sensitivity or increase autonomic responses.

Indexed as

Anticipation, PsychologicalHyperalgesiaLocus CoeruleusAdultArousalElectric StimulationFemaleHumansMaleNocebo EffectOutcome ExpectationsPhysical StimulationPupilYoung Adultcentral sensitizationnegative expectationnoradrenergic systempupil dilationsecondary mechanical hypersensitivity

Identifiers

PMID42613773
PMCPMC13486616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.