Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42613758›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care2026

Historically informed quality improvement: applying historical insights from Black women's maternity care to contemporary health service redesign.

Jennifer Creese, Bharathy Kumaravel, Kellie Moss, Maxine Chapman, Natalie Darko, Floretta Cox, Ruw Abeyratne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jennifer CreeseSchool of Medical Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6763-5997
Bharathy KumaravelSchool of Medicine, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Kellie MossLeicester Institute for Advanced Studies, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Maxine ChapmanSchool of Healthcare, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Natalie DarkoSchool of Medical Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Floretta CoxUniversity Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Ruw AbeyratneUniversity Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, United Kingdom.

Funding

Department of Health and Social CareLeicester Institute for Advanced Studies 'Into The City'National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Greater Manchester Patient Safety Research Collaboration (GM PSRC)NIHRNIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (BRC)NIHR Leicestershire County Council Health Determinants Research Collaboration (HDRC)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQuality improvement aims to systematically devise solutions to complex issues and problems in services and systems. However, many quality improvement initiatives aim to address outcomes rooted in historical policy and practice, where organizational memory may be long lost. A solid foundational understanding of past practice and policy is important to contextualize the present and highlight previous changes with sustained impact. However, it can also help to show deteriorating performance and suggest potential proven interventions which may be suitable to re-explore and identify areas which remain unchanged and problematic over the years, despite the best efforts of healthcare staff, leaders, and policymakers, indicating where deeper systemic and cultural change is required beyond the quality improvement approach.

methodsThis paper introduces a tool and approach, the historically informed quality improvement (HIQI) matrix for mapping evidence around contemporary healthcare service quality against historical data on the same services to identify key areas for policy retention, intervention evaluation, quality improvement, and cultural change. The paper illustrates the tool's use through a worked example of Black (African, African-Caribbean, and Mixed) ethnic minority women's experiences in maternity care amid a backdrop of inequalities in maternity outcomes. Ten oral history interviews with Black women who used local hospital trust maternity services 1984-2004 were conducted, alongside focus groups with 11 Black women who had used the same services in the past 12 months.

resultsIn the worked example, using the HIQI tool identified that friendly and caring midwives were the heart of a positive birth experience; improvements in satisfaction were evident, resulting from proactive hiring of midwives from similar racial/ethnic groups to mothers, and increased attention to maternal mental health. However, connection to staff and time between appointments had deteriorated over the years, and women had less confidence in what to expect in pregnancy. Issues around racial and unconscious bias and lack of voice were a prominent theme across the years, suggesting these are deep-seated issues that require broader institutional and societal cultural change and are unreliable targets for quality improvement approaches. Three quality-improvement projects for the hospital trust were identified through the use of the HIQI tool.

conclusionThe HIQI approach detailed in this paper enables quality improvement practitioners to develop a richer understanding of changes to services over the years and develop evidence-based plans for quality improvement and service evaluation. The approach also highlights core issues which are deep-seated within the institution, requiring a comprehensive culture change strategy alongside quality improvement efforts.

Indexed as

Black PeopleMaternal Health ServicesQuality ImprovementFemaleHumansPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID42613758
PMCPMC13555622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.