ArticleRenal failure2026
Cross-Sectional coaxial technique: optimizing specimen adequacy and safety in ultrasound-guided renal biopsy procedures.
Article in Renal failure, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Percutaneous renal biopsy (PRB) is the gold standard for diagnosing renal diseases. This study aimed to compare the specimen adequacy and safety of three ultrasound-guided PRB techniques: cross-sectional coaxial (Group A), longitudinal coaxial (Group B), and conventional longitudinal noncoaxial technique (Group C). This single-center retrospective study enrolled 184 adult patients who underwent PRB at Anhui Provincial Public Health Clinical Center between January 2019 and December 2025. All procedures were performed by experienced interventional radiologists. Outcomes included total glomerular yield, specimen adequacy, procedural time, and bleeding complications (perinephric hematoma, gross/microscopic hematuria). Baseline characteristics were comparable across groups. Specimen adequacy was 100% in Group A, 97.8% in Group B, and 89.1% in Group C. Group A exhibited significantly superior adequacy compared to Group C (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.