Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42613619›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2026

Network-oriented neurorehabilitation after stroke: a paradigmatic approach.

Fabio M Conti, Roger Gassert, Naz Doganci, Adrian G Guggisberg

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fabio M Conti, Cumiasca, Switzerland. fabiomario.conti@bluewin.ch.
Roger GassertRehabilitation Engineering Laboratory, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Naz DoganciDivision of Neurorehabilitation, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Adrian G GuggisbergDivision of Neurorehabilitation, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. adrian.guggisberg@hug.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke recovery increasingly demands a reconceptualization of the brain as a dynamic network system. This opinion paper advocates for a network-oriented neurorehabilitation paradigm, grounded in the understanding that functional recovery relies on the reorganization of distributed, interconnected neural systems across the central nervous system. While traditional rehabilitation approaches often target isolated impairments, a broader challenge is in the insufficient specification and documentation of therapeutic processes and their underlying mechanisms, which are often incompletely described and difficult to systematically replicate or compare across studies. We argue that effective therapy must integrate cognitive, motor, sensory, as well as perceptual, emotional, and motivational processes through strategically designed, goal-directed exercises that activate residual plastic hubs and promote adaptive connectivity. From this perspective, rehabilitation becomes a process of guided network modulation, in which task demands are dynamically adjusted to the patient's evolving capacities in order to optimize engagement and learning. Importantly, this approach responds to the need for clearer identification of treatment components, mechanisms of action, and active ingredients, enabling a more transparent and theoretically grounded description of therapeutic interventions. To illustrate these principles, we highlight key features of Cognitive Multisensory Rehabilitation (CMR) and its subsequent development into the Comparison of Actions (CTA) approach, which emphasizes action simulation and comparison within a network-oriented framework. Building on this rationale, we present a Model Structure for Network-Based Therapeutic Exercises, consisting of a five-phase model derived from a network-oriented interpretation of the CMR/CTA framework. This model provides an operational structure for translating theoretical principles into clinical practice, while making the underlying cognitive and sensorimotor processes of therapeutic action explicitly identifiable and parametrically modulable, thereby supporting greater clarity, reproducibility, and consistency in therapeutic design and implementation. In addition, we discuss how emerging technologies, such as robotics and virtual reality, may further support network engagement by enabling the controlled delivery, monitoring, and adaptation of these processes within structured therapeutic frameworks. By aligning therapeutic planning with network neuroscience, this model offers a structured yet flexible approach to personalized rehabilitation. It allows therapeutic tasks to be systematically adapted across distinct phases based on the patient's neuropsychological profile, sensorimotor status, and functional goals, while making treatment components and mechanisms more explicit and clinically interpretable. In doing so, it supports a more individualized, functionally relevant, and theoretically grounded approach to post-stroke neurorehabilitation.

Indexed as

Nerve NetNeurological RehabilitationStroke RehabilitationBrainHumansRecovery of FunctionStrokeNetwork neuroscienceNeuroplasticityPersonalized neurorehabilitationStroke rehabilitationTechnology-assisted neurorehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID42613619
PMCPMC13483814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.