ArticleBMC medicine2026
Risk-adapted intervals for colorectal cancer screening using fecal immunochemical tests: a modelling study based on the BLITZ cohort.
Article in BMC medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEstablished screening programs for colorectal cancer (CRC) based on fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) employ fixed screening intervals of either one year or two years for all participants. We aimed to assess the potential design of risk-adapted FIT screening intervals based on quantitative values of the fecal hemoglobin concentration among FIT negative participants.
methodsUsing COSIMO, a previously validated simulation tool, we compared CRC risks in subgroups with initially negative FIT. Subgroups were stratified by stool hemoglobin levels at screening (< 8 (low), 8-<10 (medium), 10-<17 µg (high) Hb/g stool), a routinely available measure in FIT-based screening programs. Colorectal neoplasia prevalences at model start were informed by 6,661 screening colonoscopy participants in Germany at average CRC risk with negative FIT and available colonoscopy results (BLITZ study). Simulations were run for hypothetical cohorts of 100,000 individuals.
resultsOf 6,661 FIT-negative participants, 6,016 (90%), 273 (4%), and 372 (6%) were in the low, medium, and high-negative subgroups, respectively. In those low-negative, expected cancer detection rates were 0.17%, 0.30%, 0.42%, 0.53%, and 0.62%, after screening intervals of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years, respectively. Cancer detection rates among the small groups of medium- and high-negative patients were up to six times higher and exceeded the expected 2-year detection rates of the low-negative group already after 1 year of follow-up.
conclusionsFecal hemoglobin concentrations among FIT negative participants may be a readily available, highly informative tool for defining risk-adapted annual or biennial FIT screening intervals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.