Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42613602›Full record

Trial reportBMC ophthalmology2026

Effectiveness of Lotrafilcon B and Balafilcon A bandage contact lenses on epithelial healing and visual symptoms after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy in the hyperopic patients.

Ali Ayatollahi, Saeid Abdi, Maryam Dashti, Saeed Rahmani, Haleh Kangari, Mohammad Ghasemi Boroumand, Zahra Kamary Rad

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialObservational Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ali AyatollahiDepartment of Optometry, School of Rehabilitation, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Damavand Street, Tehran, Iran.
Saeid AbdiDepartment of Optometry, School of Rehabilitation, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Damavand Street, Tehran, Iran. opto.abdi@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0292-2952
Maryam DashtiDepartment of Optometry, School of Rehabilitation, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Damavand Street, Tehran, Iran.
Saeed RahmaniDepartment of Optometry, School of Rehabilitation, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Damavand Street, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6330-4405
Haleh KangariDepartment of Optometry, School of Rehabilitation, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Damavand Street, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8298-9574
Mohammad Ghasemi BoroumandDepartment of Optometry, School of Rehabilitation, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Damavand Street, Tehran, Iran.
Zahra Kamary RadDepartment of Optometry, School of Rehabilitation, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Damavand Street, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4922-2803

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAfter laser treatment, a protective bandage contact lens (BCL) is placed over the eye to promote healing. During this period, patients may experience discomfort, including pain, light sensitivity, and blurred vision. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of two types of silicone hydrogel BCLs in promoting postoperative epithelial healing and reducing patient discomfort following transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (T-PRK).

methodsIn this randomized, double-masked observational study, patients with pure hyperopia or compound hyperopic astigmatism in both eyes who had undergone bilateral T-PRK were assigned to wear either Lotrafilcon B (Group 1: 62 eyes) or Balafilcon A (Group 2: 64 eyes) contact lenses. Patients were assessed on the day of surgery and daily from postoperative days 1 to 10 until re-epithelialization was confirmed via slit-lamp biomicroscopy. Corneal healing investigated objectively using slit-lamp biomicroscopy and visual symptoms like photophobia, irritation, foreign body sensation, sudden wake-ups during sleep, and pain were collected through a questionnaire once re-epithelialization was complete.

resultsThere were no significant differences between the two groups in age (35.55 ± 10.72 vs. 37.38 ± 11.97 years, p = 0.52), gender distribution (58% vs. 65% male, p = 0.60), preoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (0.02 ± 0.05 vs. 0.02 ± 0.07 LogMAR, p = 0.95), or spherical equivalent refraction (+ 3.29 ± 1.19 vs. +2.98 ± 1.30 diopters, p = 0.31). There were no significant differences between the two groups in photophobia, corneal healing, irritation, foreign body sensation, overall questionnaire scores, or reports of sudden wake-ups during sleep (p > 0.05 for all). However, statistical analysis revealed that eyes fitted with Lotrafilcon B lenses had significantly lower pain scores than those fitted with Balafilcon A lenses (p < 0.05).

conclusionsLotrafilcon B bandage contact lenses are more effective than Balafilcon A lenses in reducing ocular pain during the postoperative period of T-PRK.

Indexed as

Contact Lenses, HydrophilicEpithelium, CornealHydrogelsHyperopiaPhotorefractive KeratectomySiliconesVisual AcuityWound HealingAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRe-EpithelializationTreatment Outcomebalafilcon AHydrogelslotrafilcon BSiliconesBalafilcon ABandage contact lensLotrafilcon BTransepithelial photorefractive keratectomy

Identifiers

PMID42613602
PMCPMC13488580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.