ArticleThe journal of headache and pain2026
Headache-attributed burden among children and adolescents in Nepal: a national schools-based cross-sectional study.
Article in The journal of headache and pain, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe recently published estimates of 1-year headache prevalence among children (6-11 years) and adolescents (12-17) in Nepal. Adjusted for age and gender, these were 83.9% for all headache, 39.5% for migraine, 31.7% for undifferentiated headache (UdH), 10.0% for tension-type headache (TTH), 0.3% for probable medication-overuse headache (pMOH) and 1.9% for other headache on ≥ 15 days/month (other H15+). Here we present estimates of attributed burden.
methodsWe followed the Global Campaign's standardised protocol. In nine schools representative of the country, the child and adolescent versions of the structured HARDSHIP questionnaire were completed by pupils in class under supervision. Headache diagnoses followed ICHD-3, except for UdH, defined here as mild or moderate headache with usual duration < 1 h. Burden enquiries were in multiple domains, with timeframes of 4 weeks and 1 day, the latter based on reports of headache yesterday (HY).
resultsThere were 2,352 participants (1,040 children [44.2%]; 1,312 adolescents [55.8%]) from 2,360 eligible (participating proportion 99.7%). Symptom burden was expressed as moderate headache on an average of 2.9 days/4 weeks, lasting for 2.0 h. Mean proportion of time in ictal state (pTIS) was 1.0%, but much higher among those with pMOH (11.0%) or other H15+ (9.4%). Except for pMOH, only one third of headache episodes were medicated. Lost school time was 3% estimated from recall over the preceding 4 weeks, with similar time lost from other (social and leisure) activities. Actual absences from school yesterday because of HY were more (4.5%), suggesting losses were underestimated by recall, but, since recorded absences yesterday failed to capture absences on days preceding weekends or holidays, true losses might have been 5-6%. More than one fifth (21.7%) of parents lost time from their own work. Both emotional impact and quality-of-life (QoL) scores were sensitive to headache (and headache type), showing gradients of negative impact (pMOH and other H15+ > migraine > TTH and UdH).
conclusionsSymptom burden appeared to be relatively modest except for pMOH and H15+, but measures of impaired participation (including lost time from school), emotional impact and QoL all indicated material impact. Parents, teachers, health-care providers and policy makers should be aware of this.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.