ArticleCancer medicine2026
Colorectal Cancer in Bhutan: Identifying Health System Gaps and Priorities.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) is an emerging public health concern in Bhutan, a lower-middle-income country with a geographically challenging terrain and limited specialised oncology services. As the country undergoes an epidemiological and economic transition, CRC numbers are steadily increasing. While Bhutan has made progress in cancer control through national programmes, CRC has not been a priority cancer, and health system readiness for its screening and management remains unclear. This study aimed to assess CRC care delivery in Bhutan and identify systems gaps using the World Health Organisation's health system building blocks framework.
methodsA qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders involved in cancer care delivery. Interviews were conducted in person or via secure virtual platforms and analysed using inductive thematic analysis and deductive coding guided by the WHO health systems framework until thematic saturation was reached. A comprehensive document review of publicly available CRC-relevant services was also performed to complement the interview data collected. In total, twenty stakeholders including clinicians, policymakers, nurses and traditional medical practitioners were interviewed. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The results reflected key health system challenges including workforce shortages due to overseas migration, limited subspecialty training, and inadequate technical expertise within policymaking structures. Infrastructure constraints such as intermittent connectivity and power outages affected the functionality of the national electronic Patient Information System. CRC services remain highly centralised at tertiary hospitals, resulting in financial and geographic barriers for patients from remote districts. Medicine shortages, constrained health financing, and reliance on overseas referrals further limit service capacity. Sociocultural factors, including reliance on informal healers and delayed care-seeking behaviours, also contribute to late presentations.
conclusionStrengthening CRC care requires coordinated health system reforms and Bhutan's experience offers important lessons for small health systems seeking to strengthen cancer care amid resource constraints and complex sociopolitical contexts. PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT STATEMENT: Neither patients nor the public were involved in the development, analysis or writing of this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.