ReviewLa Radiologia medica2026
Percutaneous thermal ablation for renal cell carcinoma: a comprehensive review of current evidence and future directions.
Review in La Radiologia medica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thermal ablation (TA), including microwave ablation, radiofrequency ablation, and cryoablation, is increasingly used as a surgical alternative for T1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC), particularly in lesions measuring ≤ 3 cm. In this review, we aimed to summarize current evidence on the efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes of TA in RCC and to explore future directions in this evolving field. A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted, focusing on the indications for TA, considering tumor size and location, patient age, and comorbidity status (assessed using Charlson Comorbidity Index). Recent studies have reported favorable long-term outcomes of TA for RCC with follow-up exceeding 10 years. Among the different TA modalities, no significant differences in therapeutic efficacy or safety were observed, particularly for tumors measuring ≤ 3 cm. Compared to partial nephrectomy, the standard treatment for small renal tumors, TA offers advantages in preserving renal function and reducing the risk of complications; however, it is associated with a higher local recurrence rate. Nevertheless, favorable cancer-specific survival rates comparable to those with surgical resection have been achieved with additional TA for local residual tumors. Adjunctive techniques, including preprocedural transarterial embolization and hydrodissection, may further improve the safety and efficacy of TA. In the future, introducing advanced technologies, including robotic systems and artificial intelligence, is expected to further enhance TA's safety and efficacy in RCC management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42613495What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.