Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42613495›Full record

ReviewLa Radiologia medica2026

Percutaneous thermal ablation for renal cell carcinoma: a comprehensive review of current evidence and future directions.

Shunsuke Sugawara, Ryo Kurokawa, Satoru Ide, Masahiro Yanagawa, Mami Iima, Tsukasa Saida, Daiju Ueda, Kentaro Nishioka, Seitaro Oda, Maya Honda and 8 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in La Radiologia medica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Shunsuke SugawaraDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. shsugawa@ncc.go.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5409-7448
Ryo KurokawaDepartment of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1186-8900
Satoru IdeDepartment of Radiology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6567-6736
Masahiro YanagawaDepartment of Radiology, The University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0911-6769
Mami IimaDepartment of Fundamental Development for Advanced Low Invasive Diagnostic Imaging, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1991-2494
Tsukasa SaidaDepartment of Radiology, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4530-7375
Daiju UedaDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3878-3616
Kentaro NishiokaRadiation Oncology Division, Global Center for Biomedical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8272-7603
Seitaro OdaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4101-5113
Maya HondaPreemptive Medicine and Lifestyle-Related Disease Research Center, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5337-3455
Keitaro SofueDepartment of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6132-1623
Rintaro ItoDepartment of Innovative BioMedical Visualization, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7971-043X
Kenji HirataDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0036-8975
Koji TakumiDepartment of Radiology, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4067-2891
Akihiko SakataDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3647-7877
Tadashi WatabeDepartment of Radiology, The University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8658-2395
Mariko KawamuraDepartment of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9211-4934
Shinji NaganawaDepartment of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0214-613X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thermal ablation (TA), including microwave ablation, radiofrequency ablation, and cryoablation, is increasingly used as a surgical alternative for T1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC), particularly in lesions measuring ≤ 3 cm. In this review, we aimed to summarize current evidence on the efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes of TA in RCC and to explore future directions in this evolving field. A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted, focusing on the indications for TA, considering tumor size and location, patient age, and comorbidity status (assessed using Charlson Comorbidity Index). Recent studies have reported favorable long-term outcomes of TA for RCC with follow-up exceeding 10 years. Among the different TA modalities, no significant differences in therapeutic efficacy or safety were observed, particularly for tumors measuring ≤ 3 cm. Compared to partial nephrectomy, the standard treatment for small renal tumors, TA offers advantages in preserving renal function and reducing the risk of complications; however, it is associated with a higher local recurrence rate. Nevertheless, favorable cancer-specific survival rates comparable to those with surgical resection have been achieved with additional TA for local residual tumors. Adjunctive techniques, including preprocedural transarterial embolization and hydrodissection, may further improve the safety and efficacy of TA. In the future, introducing advanced technologies, including robotic systems and artificial intelligence, is expected to further enhance TA's safety and efficacy in RCC management.

Indexed as

CryoablationMicrowave ablationPercutaneous thermal ablationRadiofrequency ablationRenal cell carcinoma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.