ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2026
Sensory substitution under passive guidance: Effects on proprioceptive acuity and motor performance.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sensory substitution devices (SSDs) offer a unique framework for investigating attention, perception, and sensorimotor interactions. While previous studies have examined how the type of stimuli provided by an SSD and the exploration strategy applied during active manipulation affect perception, proprioception, and motor-exploratory performance, these factors have not been explored in the context of passive guidance through an SSD. In this study, we examined how the type of stimuli (modality-specific vs. cross-modal stimuli) and the exploration strategy used to passively guide participants (micro-scanning (MIC) vs. macro-scanning (MAC)) influence the perception of two-dimensional shapes during passive guidance through an SSD. We also assessed changes in proprioceptive acuity after passive guidance, and evaluated motor-exploratory performance in a subsequent tracing task. Overall, MIC was more effective than MAC for shape recognition during passive guidance. This superiority of MIC over MAC was observed across all sessions and was particularly marked in the group receiving MIC with cross-modal stimulation. Proprioceptive acuity and tracing performance were also higher following MIC training, especially with cross-modal stimuli. These findings offer new insights into multisensory processing, proprioceptive calibration, and sensorimotor transfer following passive-guided sensory substitution, highlighting the joint influence of exploration strategy and sensory feedback. They suggest an association between perceptual performance during passive guidance training and proprioceptive improvements, and open avenues for investigating its influence on subsequent motor-exploratory behavior. Data supporting this study are publicly available in a French national research data repository and include all measures needed for replication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42613492What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.