Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42613487›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2026

Linking signal integrity to probabilistic models of behavioral dynamics.

Reza Sayfoori, Hung Cao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Reza SayfooriDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA. rsayfoor@uci.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-0097-8134
Hung CaoDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4197-7208

Funding

National Science Foundation EFRI 2422412 (H.C.)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative analysis of rodent behavior in naturalistic settings is crucial for neuroscience, yet traditional methods often lack precision or scalability. While ultra-wideband (UWB) sensor tracking provides centimeter-level localization, standard metrics like root mean square error (RMSE) fail to capture the probabilistic and sequential nature of behavior. We introduce a probabilistic, information-theoretic framework that leverages high-resolution UWB sensor trajectories to address this gap. By integrating Shannon entropy to quantify uncertainty, Bernoulli modeling to assess accuracy thresholds, and first-order Markov chains to characterize state dynamics, our approach derives interpretable behavioral markers directly linked to signal quality. Empirical evaluation in an open-field arena demonstrated robust tracking under line-of-sight (LoS; RMSE: 20 mm) and non-line-of-sight (NLoS; RMSE: 35 mm) conditions. Crucially, we show that physical-layer impairments propagate to behavioral metrics: NLoS conditions increased entropy from 1.15 to 1.78 bits, reduced the probability of achieving sub-20 mm accuracy from 63.2% to 27.7%, and decreased state persistence, indicating greater behavioral fragmentation. By treating UWB signals as a probabilistic information source, our computationally efficient framework establishes a methodological bridge between engineering performance and neuroscience, enabling scalable, reproducible, and low-bias behavioral quantification suitable for preclinical research in complex environments.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalModels, StatisticalAnimalsEntropyMarkov ChainsBehavioral phenotypingInformation-theoretic analysisMarkov chainsQuantitative ethologySensor-based behavioral modelingSignal integrityUltra-wideband (UWB)

Identifiers

PMID42613487
PMCPMC13486021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.