ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2026
Deep learning-based PET/CT mixture-of-experts model for relapse risk stratification in relapsed/refractory classical hodgkin lymphoma: a multicenter study.
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- More extensive lesion and intense uptake detected by [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PentixaFor PET/CT Than [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRelapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (R/R cHL) remains clinically challenging due to substantial heterogeneity in relapse risk. Reliable, non-invasive tools for improved relapse risk stratification are urgently needed to guide individualized therapeutic strategies.
methodsIn this multicenter retrospective study, 161 patients with R/R cHL from five institutions were included (training cohort: n = 102; validation cohort: n = 59). Clinical and metabolic covariates were assessed at the time of relapsed/refractory disease and baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT before salvage treatment. We developed a deep learning-based Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) framework that integrates four medical foundation models (PET-Diffusion, SAM-Med2D, MedCLIP, and RadFM) to derive a quantitative imaging biomarker (MoEScore) from baseline
resultsMoEScore demonstrated predictive performance (AUC: 0.861 in training; 0.783 in validation) and remained independently associated with relapse (HR = 11.18, 95% CI: 2.48-50.45; P = 0.002). The multiparametric model achieved a C-index of 0.785 in the training cohort and 0.717 in the validation cohort, compared with 0.598-0.752 for the clinical and clinical-metabolic models. MoEScore consistently stratified relapse risk across both relapsed and refractory subgroups. Exploratory interpretability analyses indicated that model saliency was predominantly localized to metabolically active lesion regions and suggested a greater relative contribution of PET than CT. MoEScore distributions were broadly consistent with known histopathological subtype patterns, supporting further biological evaluation.
conclusionsThis study presents an exploratory, non-invasive deep learning framework for relapse risk stratification in R/R cHL. By integrating multimodal imaging and expert-level representations, the MoE model may capture tumor heterogeneity beyond conventional metrics and may help inform risk-adapted therapeutic strategies after further validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42613444What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.