SynthesisMolecular diagnosis & therapy2026
Circulating MicroRNAs as Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarkers for Neuroblastoma: A Systematic Review and Exploratory Re-analysis.
Synthesis in Molecular diagnosis & therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neuroblastoma is a leading cause of pediatric cancer deaths. Accurate and early risk stratification is crucial; however, current approaches rely on invasive biopsies. MicroRNAs have shown promise as non-invasive biomarkers. PubMed and EMBASE were systematically searched for studies evaluating circulating microRNAs in patients with neuroblastoma until April 2025. Eligible studies were included in a narrative synthesis. If raw expression data were available, a standardized re-analysis was performed to assess diagnostic and prognostic performance using differential expression, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and Cox regression analyses. Nine studies comprising 385 patients were included. Narrative synthesis identified four microRNAs consistently associated with high-risk disease: miR-375, miR-124-3p, miR-218-5p, and miR-490-5p. In our re-analysis, the findings were largely driven by a single cohort of 185 patients, with limited contributions from smaller studies, and should therefore be interpreted as exploratory. We identified nine microRNAs that were associated with poor prognosis. MiR-9-3p demonstrated the most promising performance for identifying high-risk disease (sensitivity = 0.95; specificity = 0.89) and the strongest association with poor overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 14.80). In multivariable analyses, miR-9-3p remained an independent predictor of poor survival (HR = 5.48) after controlling for MYCN amplification (HR = 2.08), metastatic disease (HR = 1.62), and age ≥ 18 months at diagnosis (HR = 2.30). While miR-9-3p may serve as a promising candidate biomarker for high-risk disease, there are several limitations to this study. Prospective multicenter validation is required before clinical implementation.
Identifiers
42613418What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.