Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42613414›Full record

ArticleMolecular psychiatry2026

Probing the neurochemical mechanisms of rTMS for alcohol use disorder: Results from a randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind, crossover, proton MR Spectroscopy study.

James J Prisciandaro, Lisa M McTeague, Michaela Hoffman, Andrew P Prescot, Daniel M McCalley, Kevin A Caulfield, Julia P Wolf, Konstantin Voronin, Raymond F Anton, Colleen A Hanlon

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

James J PrisciandaroDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA. priscian@musc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8877-7871
Lisa M McTeagueDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Michaela HoffmanDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Andrew P PrescotSugarData LLC, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Daniel M McCalleyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Kevin A CaulfieldDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8268-4204
Julia P WolfDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4242-6304
Konstantin VoroninDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Raymond F AntonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3417-6576
Colleen A HanlonBrainsWay Ltd, Jerusalem, Israel; Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, USA.

Funding

Evaluating Neural Architecture as a Novel Biomarker for TMS Efficacy in AUDF31AA028426 · NIAAA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI MCCALLEY, DANIEL · 2020 to 2021
$92k
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) AA010761U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) F31AA028426
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With growing knowledge of the neural circuitry involved in alcohol use disorder (AUD), interest in developing neural-circuit-based therapeutic tools, including transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), for people with AUD has increased. While mounting evidence supports the efficacy of TMS for AUD, multiple dosing protocols are currently under consideration, and little is known about the neurobiological mechanisms through which TMS leads to clinical improvement. This randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind, crossover study was designed to address this gap by evaluating the impact of a single session of two prominent TMS protocols (each relative to sham), 10 Hz TMS to dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) and continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) to medial PFC (mPFC), on levels of excitatory (glutamate, glutamine, glycine) and inhibitory (GABA) neurometabolites, using proton MR spectroscopy (MRS), in the tissue beneath the TMS coil in treatment-naïve individuals with AUD. Seventy men and women, aged 21-40 years, with moderate-severe AUD were enrolled into the study and randomly assigned to complete one of six experimental condition orders, each consisting of three TMS sessions (cTBS, 10 Hz TMS, sham) conducted on three separate days, each immediately followed by MRI/MRS. Whereas cTBS to mPFC was associated with relatively lower levels of excitatory neurometabolites (glutamine and glycine, with additional mixed support for glutamate), 10 Hz TMS to dlPFC was not, and neither protocol was associated with GABA levels. Together, these findings demonstrate acute neurochemical target engagement under the coil with a single session of cTBS to mPFC, pointing to the utility of assaying neurometabolites in further optimizing this and other candidate targets for AUD.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.