ArticleSpine deformity2026
Radiographic predictors of functional and pain outcomes in Scheuermann's kyphosis: an ROC-based minimal clinically important difference (MCID) analysis.
Article in Spine deformity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designRetrospective study.
objectivesThis study uses receiver operating characteristic (ROC)-based minimal clinically important difference (MCID) analysis to quantify which radiographic changes best predict meaningful functional and pain improvements following posterior spinal fusion for Scheuermann's kyphosis (SK). SK is a rigid spinal deformity resulting in significant back pain and functional impairment, commonly affecting adolescents and young adults. Surgical correction aims to restore sagittal balance, but the relationship between radiographic correction and patient-reported outcomes is not well-defined.
methodsA retrospective cohort of 40 patients aged 15-35 with SK who underwent posterior spinal fusion and osteotomies was analyzed. Pre- and postoperative radiographs were reviewed for thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI-LL), and T1 pelvic angle (TPA). Functional and pain outcomes were measured via Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at final follow-up (minimum 24 months for all patients), with MCID thresholds used to dichotomize outcomes; multivariable regression identified the strongest radiographic predictors.
resultsSurgical correction yielded significant improvements in alignment (mean TK reduced from 85.6° to 46.3°, PI-LL mismatch from 27.5 to 10.1; p < 0.001). VAS scores improved by 1.39 points (p = 0.010) and ODI by 6.6 (p = 0.011, Wilcoxon). Clinically meaningful pain relief was achieved in the majority, with about half exceeding MCID for function. ROC analysis revealed that final PI-LL mismatch was the most predictive of functional improvement (AUC up to 0.81 for correction magnitude), with thresholds favoring near-neutral or slightly negative alignment. For pain relief, a greater degree of TK correction was the best predictor (AUC 0.60). LL and TPA showed limited predictive power for outcomes. Multivariable models demonstrated high apparent discrimination (AUC up to 0.97) but tended to overestimate mid-range probabilities due to small sample size.
conclusionsAchieving near-neutral PI-LL mismatch and maximally reducing thoracic kyphosis are key for optimizing functional and pain outcomes in SK surgery. The study supports targeting individualized radiographic corrections over universal alignment thresholds for best clinical improvement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42613413What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.