ArticleScientific reports2026
Enhancing resilience, flexibility, and well-being through cognitive-emotional training: behavioral and neural evidence.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
College students often struggle to regulate emotions under changing academic and social stress, highlighting the need for interventions targeting adaptive emotion regulation (ER). Here, we tested a 5-week online intervention designed to enhance ER and cognitive flexibility in college students. Participants (N = 39) were pseudo-randomly assigned to the experimental (N = 20) or control (N = 19) group, with higher distress individuals preferentially assigned to the experimental condition. Behavioral, self-report, eye-tracking, and brain imaging measures were collected before and after the training. Compared to controls, the experimental group participants showed reduced emotional reactivity to negative stimuli and experiences, along with reduced visual attention to emotionally salient regions. They also showed improvements in the use of attention strategies, positive refocusing, and perceived cognitive control. In the imaging subsample (N = 23; Experimental: N = 15; Control: N = 8), these improvements were accompanied by changes in resting-state functional connectivity, including reduced coupling between affective and higher-order systems and increased efficiency of attentional control and self-referential pathways. These results suggest that training promoted more efficient and flexible interactions among emotion, attention, and cognitive control regions, providing a neural mechanism for the observed behavioral benefits. Overall, the findings support the intervention as a promising approach for improving adaptive ER and resilience during emerging adulthood.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.