ReviewBritish journal of cancer2026
Paediatric therapeutic development workshop on osteosarcoma.
Review in British journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
52 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The fourth Paediatric Therapeutic Development Workshop focused on osteosarcoma, the most common primary bone cancer in children and young adults. Current treatment of osteosarcoma comprises surgery and chemotherapy. Outcome has shown very little improvement over the last four decades and there are substantial unmet needs including improving survival, especially in metastatic or relapsed disease, and reducing treatment toxicity. There is a lack of new therapeutics in osteosarcoma, with the evaluation of new treatments challenged by complex biology and variation in chemotherapy standard of care regimens. An antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) targeting LRRC15 with an osteosarcoma-relevant payload is a promising therapeutic approach. Small molecule inhibitors and degraders targeting SMARCAL1 should be considered as a very high priority, as it is a target applicable to several high unmet need malignancies. Preclinical evaluation of KIF18A in osteosarcoma models is required. An early phase study of an eIF4A1 inhibitor is warranted. Further preclinical validation of RUNX2 using PROTACs or ADCs is required. Targeting MYC, either indirectly or directly is a high priority. Osteosarcomas have significant genomic instability and impaired DNA repair mechanisms and efforts are ongoing to exploit this vulnerability therapeutically. The goal is that these therapeutic developments will improve survival for patients with osteosarcoma.
Identifiers
42613365What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.