Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42613364›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2026

Immune and stromal tumour biology associated with neoadjuvant radiotherapy response in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Lily V S Hillson, Ashley K McCulloch, Ross K McMahon, Phimmada Hatthakarnkul, Aula Ammar, Timothy S Maughan, Enric Domingo, Sudhir B Malla, Raheleh Amirkhah, James H Park and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Lily V S HillsonWolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Bearsden, UK.
Ashley K McCullochWolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Bearsden, UK. ashley.k.mcculloch@glasgow.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4151-1563
Ross K McMahonWolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Bearsden, UK.
Phimmada HatthakarnkulWolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Bearsden, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5274-5480
Aula AmmarWolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Bearsden, UK.
Timothy S MaughanDepartment of Oncology, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Oxford, UK.
Enric DomingoDepartment of Oncology, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Oxford, UK.
Sudhir B MallaPatrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5862-3815
Raheleh AmirkhahPatrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3494-271X
James H ParkDepartment of General Surgery, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
Joanne EdwardsWolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Bearsden, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7192-6906
Philip D DunnePatrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9160-283X
Sean M O'CathailWolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Bearsden, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5574-9199
Campbell S RoxburghWolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Bearsden, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2649-6695

Funding

AstraZeneca NCT04621370Cancer Research UK (CRUK) CTRQQR-202\100006Innovate UK 42497
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResponse to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is heterogeneous. The Neoadjuvant Rectal (NAR) score quantifies treatment response via tumour downstaging and nodal status and correlates with survival outcomes. This work set out to explore whether low NAR and high NAR tumours represent biologically distinct groups pre-treatment.

methodsTranscriptome microarrays quantified RNA expression within pre-treatment biopsies from LARC patients in GSE87211 and S:CORT consortium Grampian datasets. A validation cohort from the Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre was analysed using multiplex immunofluorescence and H&E-derived tumour-stromal ratios.

resultsSeventeen MSigDB Hallmarks were enriched in high NAR tumours; 'Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition' was notably enriched (padj < 0.001). Immune-related signatures were enriched in low NAR tumours (p < 0.25). Both cohorts showed higher Microenvironment Cell Population counter 'Cytotoxic Lymphocytes' in low NAR (p < 0.05) and more stromal cells ('Endothelial Cells', 'Fibroblasts'; p < 0.05) in high NAR tumours. CD8 densities confirmed higher immune infiltration in low NAR tumours. DISCUSSION: Pre-treatment biopsies show consistent microenvironmental differences between high and low NAR tumours. While immune and stromal features are associated with response, the observed differences are insufficient to serve as standalone predictive biomarkers.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.