ArticleScientific reports2026
Identification of acute kidney injury after non-cardiac surgery by machine learning leveraging a large electronic health record database.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Post-operative acute kidney injury (PO-AKI) is a frequent complication after non-cardiac surgery, substantially increasing patients' mortality and morbidity rates. Early identification of patients at high risk of PO-AKI could facilitate improved patient care. We investigated a large, single-center database of 13,890 patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery, of whom 1,718 (12.37%) developed PO-AKI. Based on 62 pre-, intra- and postoperative patient characteristics, including time-series mean arterial pressure measurements, we trained and validated eight different machine learning (ML) algorithms to predict PO-AKI. Top ML model performance based on Area under the Receiver Operating Characteristics curve (ROC-AUC) was achieved at 0.742 (95% CI, 0.725-0.762) on the validation data set by a Random Forest classifier. Feature Importance assessment revealed a wide range of patient characteristics predictive of PO-AKI, which, however, varied considerably between ensemble and non-ensemble ML models. Training and evaluation of Random Forest models at seven different perioperative time-points revealed a performance increase in ROC-AUC from 0.722 (95% CI, 0.703-0.746) preoperatively to 0.738 (95% CI, 0.716-0.755) postoperatively on the validation data set. In conclusion, we present a comprehensive performance evaluation of different ML algorithms for the personalized prediction of PO-AKI on a large, real-world electronic health record data set.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.