Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42613106›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Primary care referrals and abdominal imaging in people with new-onset diabetes and weight loss: cohort study using the English national sentinel network database.

Agnieszka Lemanska, Hugh Claridge, Claire A Price, Jessica Abell, Eithne Costello, Georgina Evans-Lilley, Stephen Pandol, Poppy Richards, Rachael Z Stolzenberg-Solomon, Simon de Lusignan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Agnieszka LemanskaImperial Clinical Trials Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK a.lemanska@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4849-2430
Hugh ClaridgeFaculty of Health and Medical Science, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5998-2860
Claire A PriceFaculty of Health and Medical Science, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Jessica AbellNational Health Service (NHS) England, National Cancer Programme, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2125-2229
Eithne CostelloMolecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0104-8992
Georgina Evans-LilleyNational Health Service (NHS) England, National Cancer Programme, London, UK.
Stephen PandolDepartment of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Poppy RichardsNational Health Service (NHS) England, National Cancer Programme, London, UK.
Rachael Z Stolzenberg-SolomonDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Simon de LusignanFaculty of Health and Medical Science, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5613-6810

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPancreatic cancer is diagnosed in approximately 1% of individuals with new-onset diabetes, increasing to 3% among those aged ≥60 years with weight loss. UK clinical guidelines recommend abdominal imaging to rule out pancreatic cancer in this high-risk group. In June 2025, National Health Service (NHS) England launched a case-finding pilot to test approaches to improve primary care referrals for imaging in these patients and improve the quality of body weight and diabetes-related data recorded in electronic healthcare records (EHRs). This study reports referral and imaging rates among the eligible group and the availability of body weight and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) measurements in people with diabetes, providing baseline data prior to implementation of the NHS England pilot.

designRetrospective cohort study.

settingPrimary care. The database of 8 million patients from 781 general practices from the Royal College of General Practitioners Research and Surveillance Centre.

participantsAdults diagnosed with diabetes between 2015 and 2021. OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportions of eligible individuals who received a referral and imaging within 12 months before or after diabetes diagnosis and the number of body weight and HbA1c measurements recorded for individuals with diabetes.

resultsAmong 180 815 individuals diagnosed with diabetes, 92 210 (51.0%) were aged ≥60 years (median age 71, 46% women). Overall, 152 300 (84.2%) had at least one body weight and 161 631 (89.4%) had at least one HbA1c measurement recorded in EHRs. Among the 1411 patients with new-onset diabetes and weight loss, 372 (26.4%) had a referral, 141 (10.0%) imaging and 40 (2.8%) had pancreatic cancer recorded.

conclusionsThis study demonstrated potential underutilisation of referral guidance and under-referral among the eligible population. The findings provide baseline data to support the launch of the NHS England pilot. Further research is needed to better understand current practice and support the implementation of cancer referral guidelines.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusPancreatic NeoplasmsPrimary Health CareReferral and ConsultationWeight LossAdultAgedDatabases, FactualElectronic Health RecordsEnglandFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesGlycated HemoglobinDIABETES & ENDOCRINOLOGYElectronic Health RecordsPancreatic diseasePrimary CarePrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID42613106
PMCPMC13504520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.