ReviewEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society2026
The future of home oxygen therapy.
Review in European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Home oxygen therapy is a well-accepted treatment for advanced respiratory disease; however, there are substantial evidence gaps and implementation challenges. The patient experience varies widely; oxygen therapy devices are often poorly matched to patient needs; and adherence is suboptimal. Recent clinical trials have failed to demonstrate positive outcomes of home oxygen therapy across a range of indications and patient groups, raising new questions regarding which patients will benefit. We convened a home oxygen therapy summit, bringing together experts in the fields of hypoxia biology, biomarkers, home oxygen therapy, behavioural science, and clinical trials, to identify the critical steps necessary to advance the science and practice of home oxygen therapy. Prescription of oxygen therapy depends on identification of hypoxaemia, with or without evidence of end-organ dysfunction. However, this does not acknowledge that hypoxaemia does not always yield hypoxia, and ignores adaptation to hypoxia. There is a pressing need for a hypoxia biomarker that is sensitive and specific, reflects the mechanisms of adaptation and maladaptation to chronic hypoxia, and is responsive to change with supplemental oxygen. Advances in research and clinical care will require more "usable" devices that meet the needs of patients and provide value for payers. Optimising oxygen devices will require new technologies with greater portability and greater capacity for oxygen delivery. Registry-based clinical trials may allow measurement of long-term outcomes and identification of patients most likely to benefit from oxygen therapy. Collaborations between patients, clinicians, researchers, payers and industry will be critical to drive this field forward.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.