ArticlePsychiatry investigation2026
Efficacy and Safety of Acupuncture for Anxiety Disorders in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Article in Psychiatry investigation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture in treating anxiety disorders in adults and provide evidence-based support for clinical practice.
methodsRandomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing experimental groups that received acupuncture for anxiety disorders with control groups that did not were retrieved from four databases (PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Embase). The standardised mean difference (SMD) and relative risk (RR) of each, along with its 95% confidence interval (CI), were calculated.
resultsTwelve RCTs involving 1,240 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Meta-analysis results showed a significantly superior improvement in anxiety symptoms in the acupuncture group compared with the control group, based on both post-treatment scores (SMD=-0.80, 95% CI: -1.11 to -0.48, p<0.001) and change score values (SMD=-1.11, 95% CI: -1.56 to -0.65, p<0.001). Subgroup analyses demonstrated a consistent trend of efficacy across different assessment scales, and there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between the acupuncture group and the control group (RR=1.97, 95% CI: 0.50 to 7.74). Sensitivity analysis did not reveal significant changes in the results, confirming the robustness of these findings.
conclusionCurrent evidence indicates that acupuncture is an effective and safe intervention for treating anxiety disorders in adults, significantly reducing anxiety symptoms with an incidence of adverse events comparable to that of a control group. It is recommended that acupuncture be considered an alternative option in the comprehensive management of anxiety disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.