ArticleJournal of anxiety disorders2026
Associations among anxiety sensitivity, intolerance of uncertainty, and experiential avoidance: Are these key processes underlying anxiety-related pathology adequately distinct from each other?
Article in Journal of anxiety disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Anxiety sensitivity (AS), Intolerance of Uncertainty (IU), and Experiential Avoidance (EA) have been conceptualized as key transdiagnostic processes underlying anxiety pathology. However, little work has been done to examine whether AS, IU, and EA are adequately distinct from one another in relation to concerns about jangle fallacies - whether two or more measures with different labels may actually assess the same construct. The present study used data from 300 treatment-seeking individuals with a primary diagnosis of one of five anxiety-related disorders-panic disorder, social anxiety disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder, or posttraumatic stress disorder-to examine the nature of shared variance among these variables. First, Pearson product-moment correlations were computed using total scores from pretreatment values for the ASI-3, IUS-27, and BEAQ. Second, these associations were re-examined accounting for general anxiety and depressive symptoms by calculating partial correlations. Third, to test whether the five scales represented distinct but correlated latent constructs, we conducted a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) at the item level, and subsequently an exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Fourth, in exploratory analyses, we examined unique prediction of anxiety for each of these measures and employed a recently-recommended strategy for assessing extrinsic convergent validity. Overall, our analyses indicated that these constructs are distinguishable from each other and general measures of anxiety and depression, yet their underlying structure is more fine-grained than reflected by total scores from these measures. Despite successful differentiation at a subfactor level, exploratory analysis revealed extrinsic convergent validity issues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.