ArticleHealth promotion international2026
Feasibility of LifeLab Dublin: a co-designed health literacy intervention for socioeconomic disadvantaged schools.
Article in Health promotion international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High health literacy (HL) is associated with improved health behaviours and outcomes. Schools are an ideal environment to improve adolescents' HL levels. This study assessed the feasibility of LifeLab Dublin, a co-designed HL intervention, for socioeconomically disadvantaged schools. Students (N = 356) and teachers (N = 15) from four Dublin schools participated in this study. A pre-post follow-up, single-arm feasibility, mixed methods study design was adopted, guided by the Orsmond and Cohn (2015) feasibility objectives. Data sources included research records, semistructured interviews and focus groups, and student and teacher surveys. A combined inductive-deductive reflexive thematic analysis was conducted on the interview and focus group data. Descriptive statistics were run on survey data. Student surveys measured HL, wellbeing, and health-related quality of life at baseline, postintervention, and follow-up. Data sources were analysed independently and integrated during write up. Interviews and focus group data indicated positive experiences with the LifeLab programme among students and teachers. School-level recruitment rates were low (6% participated), but the individual level was strong (91% participated). Attrition rates were 13.8% postintervention and 16.8% at follow-up. Including additional content for each health topic, flexibility in delivery, and the inclusion of structured teacher training may improve the programme. Moderate HL levels and good wellbeing was observed at baseline. Mean increases were observed from baseline to follow-up in students' HL, wellbeing, and health-related quality of life. Evidence supports the feasibility and acceptability of LifeLab for young adolescents and teachers, with progression to a definitive trial as a logical next step.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.