ArticleJMIR aging2026
Measuring Implicit Attitudes Toward Digital Health Technologies in Older Adults Using an Influence-Aware Affect Misattribution Procedure: Development and Feasibility Study.
Article in JMIR aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Older adults often express positive attitudes toward digital health technologies in surveys, yet adoption remains low. Self-report measures may not capture automatic affective reactions such as anxiety or distrust. Implicit paradigms such as the affect misattribution procedure (AMP) can reveal these automatic attitudes, but parameters optimized for younger adults may not be suitable for older adults because of age-related slowing and changes in visual processing. Objective: This study aimed to adapt and evaluate an influence-aware affect misattribution procedure (IA-AMP) for measuring implicit attitudes of older adults toward digital health technologies and to identify an age-appropriate prime duration that balances affect transfer strength with minimal conscious awareness. Methods: A 2-phase methodological adaptation and feasibility study was conducted among older adults (aged ≥60 y). Phase 1 (n=40) involved the development and validation of age-relevant synthetic images depicting older adults using digital health tools. The images were evaluated based on valence, arousal, thematic relevance, and low-level perceptual features. Phase 2 (n=56) implemented an IA-AMP with 3 prime durations (75, 350, and 425 ms) across 2 sequential cohorts. The first cohort (batch 2A, n=29) used the initial awareness probe, whereas the second cohort (batch 2B, n=27) used a simplified awareness interface. The core IA-AMP target judgment task remained unchanged across batches. The primary inferential outcome was the binary trial-level target judgment, coded as pleasant or unpleasant. Trial-level responses were analyzed using binomial logistic mixed-effects models with prime valence, prime duration, their interaction, and batch as fixed effects, along with random intercepts for participant and prime image. Awareness analyses were restricted to batch 2B. Results: The primary generalized linear mixed-effects model showed a significant prime valence × prime duration interaction ( Conclusions: The IA-AMP offers a promising approach for assessing the affective responses of older adults to digital health technologies beyond self-report. A prime duration of approximately 350 milliseconds appears to be a practical calibration point for AMP studies involving older adults, producing strong affect transfer effects while avoiding the longest exposure duration. Because reported influence awareness was common, AMP effects should be interpreted alongside awareness measures rather than as awareness-free implicit attitudes. AMP-based affective measures may complement usability and adoption research by identifying emotional responses that users may not readily articulate, thereby supporting more inclusive and evidence-informed development, evaluation, and implementation of digital health technologies for aging populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.