ReviewJournal of clinical pharmacology2026
Clinical Pharmacology in China: Seven Decades of Progress in Discipline Development and Education.
Review in Journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clinical pharmacology serves as the central discipline supporting rational clinical medication, innovative drug research, and full-lifecycle pharmaceutical supervision. Domestic clinical pharmacology research began in the 1950s, and the field entered a period of rapid development after 1979 across three phases. This study sorts domestic disciplinary milestones and analyzes three key datasets: among the 1949 registered drug clinical trial institutions nationwide, nearly 50% are located in East China; investigational new drug applications surged from 446 (2012) to 3516 (2025); and the Center for Drug Evaluation issued 631 technical guidelines. The National Natural Science Foundation set up an independent clinical pharmacology discipline classification in 2015. The multi-tiered educational system is further elaborated: the transitional 5-year pharmacy (clinical pharmacology direction) track, standardized 5-year clinical pharmacy undergraduate programs, and clinical pharmacology-oriented postgraduate research sub-disciplines under pharmacy-related majors. Although the field has built a complete framework covering basic research, clinical practice and regulatory evaluation, critical bottlenecks persist. Clinical pharmacology is not listed as an independent major in national undergraduate and postgraduate catalogues, resulting in uneven educational standards, insufficient industry-academia integration, and striking regional gaps in disciplinary resources between eastern and inland areas. China's transitional undergraduate training model and phased regulatory improvements provide practical references for pharmaceutical regulators and educators worldwide. Targeted optimization strategies are proposed to construct unified tiered educational systems, deepen cross-stakeholder collaborative innovation, and balance regional disciplinary layouts. The sound and balanced development of clinical pharmacology will continuously advance standardized clinical medication, accelerate domestic new drug innovations, and strengthen national public health protection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.