ArticleWomen's health (London, England)
Making encounters count: Healthcare professionals' experiences of providing care in Norwegian sexual assault centres.
Article in Women's health (London, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundAlthough the negative health consequences of sexual assault are well documented, less is known about how healthcare experience and navigate their clinical and medico-legal roles when providing care in the immediate aftermath of an assault. Understanding these processes is important for strengthening care practices within sexual assault centres (SACs).ObjectivesTo explore how healthcare personnel (HCP) at Norwegian SACs understand, reflect on, and navigate their work during acute sexual assault consultations, to better understand the clinical, relational, and medico-legal dimensions of this care.DesignQualitative study based on focus groups and reflexive thematic analysis.MethodsFour focus group interviews were conducted with physicians and nurses from four SACs across Norway. Interviews lasted for 75-100 minutes and explored clinical decision-making, emotional experiences, and perceptions of the SAC role. Data was analysed using Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis, which emphasizes the active, interpretive role of researchers and is well suited to examining how professionals construct meaning in complex care contexts.ResultsThree overarching themes were identified. (1)
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.