ArticlePloS one2026
Evaluation of extracellular microRNAs as potential biomarker candidates for assessing chlamydia reinfection risk.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chlamydia trachomatis infection remains prevalent, with high rates of reinfection. Most infections are asymptomatic, and without treatment, women are at risk for reproductive and perinatal complications that are exacerbated with repeat infections. Currently, no C. trachomatis vaccine is available nor are there clinical biomarkers to predict reinfection risk. Small, non-coding microRNAs (miRNAs) are promising biomarker candidates because of their easy isolation, high stability, and role as molecular messengers. MiRNAs can be intracellular and/or extracellular, with the latter being released from cells and either packaged into extracellular vesicles (EVs) or freely circulating in association with proteins. We identified miRNAs from serum EVs and whole serum collected from 42 women (53 samples) and 35 women (49 samples), respectively. Sera were collected at a baseline treatment visit and a 3-month follow-up visit, where women were determined to be reinfected or not reinfected by nucleic acid amplification test. MiRNA profiles were evaluated using Bruker nCounter microarrays, data were positive ligation normalized, miRNAs were categorized as detected or not detected, nominal significance was calculated using Fisher's exact test, and predicted target mRNAs were assessed with Qiagen's Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA). Detection of EV-derived miR-888-5p at baseline was associated with reinfection at the follow-up visit. For whole serum, detection of miR-1285-5p, -548aa + 548t-3p, and -575 at baseline were associated with absence of reinfection at follow-up. MiRs-888-5p and -548aa aligned with varying degrees to mRNA targets associated with CD8+ and CD4 + T-cell functions, with miR-888-5p demonstrating strong CD8 + T-cell associations while miR-548aa was largely associated with CD4 + T-cell responses. Distinct EV and whole serum miRNAs were identified as potential biomarker candidates that are associated with reinfection risk. Our findings are preliminary, and future work includes validation studies to confirm whether these miRNAs can predict C. trachomatis reinfection risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.