ArticlePLoS biology2026
Inhibitory tone in the dentate gyrus dynamically prioritizes memory flexibility or stability by tuning a sensitivity-consistency continuum.
Article in PLoS biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A fundamental challenge for memory systems is balancing two opposing demands: sensitivity, which enables the encoding of subtle differences between similar experiences, and consistency, which preserves stable representations against interference. How the brain resolves this trade-off has remained unclear. Here, we identify inhibition in the dentate gyrus (DG) as a regulator of this balance, shifting hippocampal computation between sensitivity- and consistency-dominated regimes. Using an integrative approach that combines cell-type-specific pharmacogenetics in mice, behavioral assays, and computational modeling, we demonstrate that reducing inhibition during the encoding of overlapping experiences enhances later discrimination during recall. Computational modeling further predicted that, besides discrimination enhancement, disinhibition also increases susceptibility to interference, an effect that becomes particularly critical under high memory load, and compromises memory consistency across experiences. Conversely, increased inhibition stabilized memory representations, but reduced sensitivity, rendering similar experiences indistinguishable. These specific predictions were confirmed experimentally, showing that the DG inhibition tunes a sensitivity-consistency continuum. Together, our results uncover a systems-level principle by which hippocampal circuits dynamically prioritize flexibility or stability in memory formation depending on inhibitory tone. This framework advances our understanding of how the brain balances competing computational demands and has implications for neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders in which excitation-inhibition balance is disrupted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.