Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42611924›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2026

Can intrinsic loop energetics predict G-Quadruplex topology?

Michał Jurkowski, Mateusz Kogut, Mikołaj Ławicki, Jacek Czub

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michał JurkowskiDepartment of Physical Chemistry, Gdańsk University of Technology, Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6369-3527
Mateusz KogutDepartment of Physical Chemistry, Gdańsk University of Technology, Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1534-0863
Mikołaj ŁawickiDepartment of Physical Chemistry, Gdańsk University of Technology, Gdańsk, Poland.
Jacek CzubDepartment of Physical Chemistry, Gdańsk University of Technology, Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3639-6935

Funding

National Science Centre, Poland
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Naturally occurring DNA G-quadruplexes (G4s) regulate many cellular processes, such as gene expression and replication, whereas designed G4s serve as building blocks for controllable nanodevices. Composed of four G-tracts and three loops, G4s exhibit high structural polymorphism, mainly associated with different geometries adopted by the loops. Understanding the biological role of G4s and facilitating their targeted design require detailed knowledge of their folding preferences, which likely originate from the stability of individual loops. However, sequence-dependent preferences for loop geometries and their effects on the overall G4 conformational landscape remain unclear. Here, we used molecular dynamics simulations to systematically evaluate folding free energies of all five standard G4 loop geometries across four loop lengths. Our results reveal that loop-geometry preferences strongly depend on the loop spatial span and, with increasing length, shift from low-span toward large-span geometries. Crucially, we discovered that the overall G4 fold is primarily dictated by internal loop stabilities in three-tetrad G4s but not in two-tetrad ones, where inter-loop interactions emerge as vital stability determinants. Moreover, internal loop stabilities explain the exceptional structural diversity of G4s with three-nucleotide loops reported by experimental studies. Finally, we show that loop-geometry preferences arise from an interplay between the electrostatic repulsion of phosphate groups and loop overstretching.

Indexed as

DNAG-QuadruplexesComputational BiologyMolecular Dynamics SimulationNucleic Acid ConformationThermodynamicsDNA

Identifiers

PMID42611924
PMCPMC13497301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.