ArticlePloS one2026
Measuring nationwide US online media mentions of fish found in the North Central Region.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper focuses on quantifying online media discussions of fish species that are associated with recreational fishing cultures in the United States. Specifically, we observe online and social media discussions of Bluegill, Largemouth Bass, Walleye, Rainbow Trout, and Yellow Perch, which are major fishes in the North Central Region. Observations were drawn from social and news media posted online in the US between July 1st, 2020, and July 1st, 2024. A total of 611,052 social media mentions of the fish species were found. We also investigate the relationship between national online media mentions and net sentiment to the surface temperatures recorded in the Great Lakes using pairwise correlations. We find consistent levels of mentions of these species. We sub-search within these results, looking for discussions specific to the origin of the fish -- wild caught or farmed. We find only 1% to 5% of mentions of each species specifically mentioned wild or farmed origins. We evaluate the net sentiment of the mentions of the fish, finding generally positive sentiment. Mentions of these fish are generally more significantly correlated (than net sentiment) to surface temperatures in the Great Lakes region. These findings suggest that these fish were referred to in general terms, and seldom in terms of whether they were caught or farmed. The results between surface temperatures and mentions highlight the importance of careful consideration of catchability and temperature levels in fisheries management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.