ArticlePloS one2026
Major changes in gene expression between strains of diapausing and non-diapause spruce budworm.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Polymorphism in Ontogenetic Duration inInsects · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To survive harsh winter conditions, many insects enter a state of dormancy called diapause which allows them to withstand extreme temperatures and lack of food. When diapause is induced, insects enter a state of arrested development with a low metabolic rate. Because diapause and environmental conditions are closely linked, variation within and between species in diapause induction, depth, and duration is extremely common. Studies investigating the genetic underpinnings of diapause tend to focus on either different populations and/or environmental variation. We use the eastern spruce budworm (Choristoneura fumiferana) to investigate within-population variation in diapause induction. Typically, C. fumiferana diapauses as second instar larvae, but a small subset of individuals do not diapause and instead continues through development. This non-diapause phenotype can be selected to create a non-diapause strain. Here, we present a chromosome-level assembly of such a non-diapause strain and compare it to an earlier published genome assembly of the diapause strain. Despite the very large life history difference, we did not find evidence of major chromosome rearrangements, indicating that the genetic variation between strains is likely small. Gene expression comparisons between the strains indicate major gene expression changes, where genes associated with glycolysis and environmental signaling processing increase in expression in the diapause strain. Lastly, we found that gene expression diverges halfway through the first instar.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.