Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42611879›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2026

Enteric pathogens in soil adjacent to public waste bins in Maputo, Mozambique offers potential for environmental surveillance.

Jack Dalton, Gouthami Rao, Marcia Chiluvane, Victoria Cumbane, David Holcomb, Erin Kowalsky, Amanda Lai, Elly Mataveia, Vanessa Monteiro, Edna Viegas and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jack DaltonFaculty of Engineering and Physical Science, School of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, England, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6073-0363
Gouthami RaoDepartment of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Marcia ChiluvaneCentro de Investigação e Treino em Saúde da Polana Caniço (CISPOC), Instituto Nacional de Saúde, Maputo, Mozambique.
Victoria CumbaneCentro de Investigação e Treino em Saúde da Polana Caniço (CISPOC), Instituto Nacional de Saúde, Maputo, Mozambique.
David HolcombDepartment of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4055-7164
Erin KowalskySchool of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GeorgiaUnited States of America.
Amanda LaiDepartment of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Elly MataveiaCentro de Investigação e Treino em Saúde da Polana Caniço (CISPOC), Instituto Nacional de Saúde, Maputo, Mozambique.
Vanessa MonteiroCentro de Investigação e Treino em Saúde da Polana Caniço (CISPOC), Instituto Nacional de Saúde, Maputo, Mozambique.
Edna ViegasCentro de Investigação e Treino em Saúde da Polana Caniço (CISPOC), Instituto Nacional de Saúde, Maputo, Mozambique.
Joe BrownDepartment of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Drew CaponeDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2138-6382

Funding

Biostatstics for Research in Environmental HealthT32ES007018 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Stephanie Engel, Rebecca Fry · 1985 to 2026
$31.3M
NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wastewater surveillance has been widely adopted since the COVID-19 pandemic, but non-sewered (e.g., onsite) sanitation is a common form of sanitation in cities of low- and middle-income countries. Environmental surveillance in these settings requires alternatives to wastewater. We collected 81 soil samples adjacent to public waste bins inside the sewered and non-sewered areas of Maputo and a 150-meter-wide buffer zone between the two areas, as well as from subsistence farms near the wastewater treatment plant for comparison. We cultured Escherichia coli (E. coli) and determined the prevalence of 29 unique enteric pathogens via RT-qPCR. E. coli concentrations were significantly higher (p < .001) in soils adjacent to public waste bins (mean = 5.1x105 per gram) compared to soils from farms (mean = 8.7x101 per gram). The mean number of unique pathogens was higher in soils from the non-sewered area (mean = 7.9, n = 32 samples) and the 150-meter buffer area (mean = 11, n = 10) compared to the sewered area (mean = 4.6, n = 20) and soils from farms (mean = 3.8, n = 19). Findings demonstrate that the presence of enteric pathogens in soils adjacent to public waste bins were associated with neighborhood sanitation infrastructure. In high-burden settings with poor sanitation, direct examination of soils and other environmental matrices are potentially scalable means of environmental pathogen surveillance to consider beyond conventional matrices.

Identifiers

PMID42611879
PMCPMC13485064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.