ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Enteric pathogens in soil adjacent to public waste bins in Maputo, Mozambique offers potential for environmental surveillance.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Wastewater surveillance has been widely adopted since the COVID-19 pandemic, but non-sewered (e.g., onsite) sanitation is a common form of sanitation in cities of low- and middle-income countries. Environmental surveillance in these settings requires alternatives to wastewater. We collected 81 soil samples adjacent to public waste bins inside the sewered and non-sewered areas of Maputo and a 150-meter-wide buffer zone between the two areas, as well as from subsistence farms near the wastewater treatment plant for comparison. We cultured Escherichia coli (E. coli) and determined the prevalence of 29 unique enteric pathogens via RT-qPCR. E. coli concentrations were significantly higher (p < .001) in soils adjacent to public waste bins (mean = 5.1x105 per gram) compared to soils from farms (mean = 8.7x101 per gram). The mean number of unique pathogens was higher in soils from the non-sewered area (mean = 7.9, n = 32 samples) and the 150-meter buffer area (mean = 11, n = 10) compared to the sewered area (mean = 4.6, n = 20) and soils from farms (mean = 3.8, n = 19). Findings demonstrate that the presence of enteric pathogens in soils adjacent to public waste bins were associated with neighborhood sanitation infrastructure. In high-burden settings with poor sanitation, direct examination of soils and other environmental matrices are potentially scalable means of environmental pathogen surveillance to consider beyond conventional matrices.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.