Observational studyThe journal of trauma and acute care surgery2026
Defining pediatric cervical spine clearance with computed tomography: A prospective observational study by the Western Pediatric Surgery Research Consortium and Western Trauma Association.
Observational study in The journal of trauma and acute care surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe optimal imaging strategy for pediatric cervical spine clearance remains controversial. The primary objective of this study was to determine the sensitivity of computed tomography (CT) in detecting clinically significant cervical spine injury in children. We hypothesized that CT is sufficiently sensitive to allow for definitive clearance of the pediatric cervical spine after blunt trauma.
methodsWe conducted a prospective, multicenter, observational study from March 1, 2022, to July 31, 2025, at 72 diverse adult, mixed, and pediatric trauma centers across the United States. All children <18 years who underwent cervical spine imaging after blunt trauma were included. The primary outcome was the ability of CT to identify a clinically significant cervical spine injury requiring operative intervention or halo placement. We performed a post hoc panel review of all cases with normal imaging that required surgery. The diagnostic test characteristics and 95% CI of CT were calculated.
resultsWe prospectively enrolled 19,651 pediatric patients, of whom 12,693 (65%) underwent cervical spine CT and comprise the analytic cohort. The median age was 12 (interquartile range, 6-15), 37% (n=4,673) were female, and 19% (n=2,389) were obtunded, defined as GCS ≤13. The sensitivity of CT at the treating hospitals to identify a clinically significant injury was 94.7% [CI: 89.4%-97.5%], with a negative predictive value of 99.9% [CI: 99.9%-100%]. Error analysis identified eight patients with false-negative CT interpretations, of which six injuries were identifiable on retrospective review. Accounting for retrospectively identifiable injuries, CT sensitivity for detecting clinically significant injury was 98.7% [CI: 94.8%-99.8%], with a negative predictive value of 100% [CI: 99.9%-100%].
conclusionsIn pediatric blunt trauma patients evaluated for cervical spine injury, CT is highly sensitive for detecting clinically significant injuries. These findings support pediatric cervical spine clearance based on a normal cervical spine CT. ( J Trauma Acute Care Surg . 2026;101: 844-857.). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diganostic Tests/Criteria; Level III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.