ReviewESC heart failure2026
Device therapies in cardiorenal syndrome: an expert review.
Review in ESC heart failure, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Managing cardiorenal syndrome in acute decompensated heart failure remains a major challenge in contemporary cardiology. While pharmacological decongestion with diuretics is the cornerstone of therapy and is effective in most patients, worsening renal function and diuretic resistance continue to pose challenges in selected cases. Device-based therapies are increasingly explored to target key pathophysiological mechanisms underlying cardiorenal dysfunction. This expert review builds on a conceptual framework for device-based therapies. Rather than cataloguing individual technologies, we apply a functional framework that classifies devices according to their primary mode of action: reduction of venous or lymphatic congestion ('pullers'), augmentation of arterial perfusion ('pushers'), and direct removal of sodium and/or fluid ('removers'). For each category, we integrate pathophysiological rationale with available clinical evidence, highlighting the predominance of early-phase physiological evidence and the need for randomized studies demonstrating benefit beyond optimized contemporary medical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.